See changes in changelog, but...

[awesomized/libmemcached] / lib / memcached_auto.c

diff --git a/lib/memcached_auto.c b/lib/memcached_auto.c
index e779f279a7966928f5d95e7add9cf73c4d591d6e..29bcf2a6b340261906425dbb27aaca139613a42f 100644 (file)
--- a/lib/memcached_auto.c
+++ b/lib/memcached_auto.c
@@ -24,14 +24,22 @@ static memcached_return memcached_auto(memcached_st *ptr,
                         offset);
   if (send_length >= MEMCACHED_DEFAULT_COMMAND_SIZE)
     return MEMCACHED_WRITE_FAILURE;
-  sent_length= send(ptr->hosts[server_key].fd, buffer, send_length, 0);
+  sent_length= memcached_io_write(ptr, server_key, buffer, send_length, 1);
 
   if (sent_length == -1 || sent_length != send_length)
     return MEMCACHED_WRITE_FAILURE;
 
   memset(buffer, 0, MEMCACHED_DEFAULT_COMMAND_SIZE);
-  send_length= read(ptr->hosts[server_key].fd, buffer, MEMCACHED_DEFAULT_COMMAND_SIZE);
 
+  rc= memcached_response(ptr, buffer, MEMCACHED_DEFAULT_COMMAND_SIZE, server_key);
+
+  /* 
+    So why recheck responce? Because the protocol is brain dead :)
+    The number returned might end up equaling one of the string 
+    values. Less chance of a mistake with memcmp() so we will 
+    use it. We still called memcached_response() though since it
+    worked its magic for non-blocking IO.
+  */
   if (!memcmp(buffer, "ERROR\r\n", MEMCACHED_DEFAULT_COMMAND_SIZE))
   {
     *value= 0;